User:Kfc18645

Comments in Wikipedia
1. First Point. I find great pleasure reading the old discussions in archives of Goguryeo and Balhae, or Bohai as Chinese call it. Ha-ha. Very funny. Many people, including both Chinese and Korean editors, thought that being part of a country's history equals it is exclusively that country's history. Absolutely not. Balhae is part of Korean history and Chinese history because it was in both modern countrys' territory, exchanged with them, and had any part in political matters or invaded into one country's territory, then the country belongs to both countrys' history. I'll example Napoleon. He was born in France, mainly lived in France until he was old, was an Emperor in France, and is he only part of French History? he is not, he is also part of the German, Spanish, British, Polish, Italian, Russian, Swiss, Austrian etc. histories. And another example is the Liao Dynasty. It invaded China, so it was part of Chinese history. It invaded Korea, so it is also part of Korean History. Being part of another state's history does not equal it belongs in the state's history. it is just part of it. Kfc 18645  talk  09:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Koguryo is definitely Korean, no Chinese today still practice Koguryo culture like Koreans. Balhae should be shared history but not between China. Chinese have nothing do with Balhae's history. No Chinese were living within Balhae's territory and did not contributed to Balhae's culture. Balhae archaeological artifacts are now shared between Russia and Korea, and both countries joined the research but only China denies any foreign researchers to accessing Balhae's artifacts and heritage sites. Liao case is different because bulk of Liao's people were also Chinese, but with case with Koguryo and Balhae, no Chinese were allowed to stayed within their territories. And Chinese language share no similarity with Koguryo & Balhae languages. Han, Tang, Liao, and Yuan Dynasties all held their territories in Korean peninsula and allowed Koreans to become their citizens as long as they pledge royalty to emperor, but no Koreans are claiming them as part of Korean history. --Korsentry 03:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I said part. I do not think it is completely in it. It is part of the history, not all. Kfc 18645  talk  03:59, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Er, a reason.
''My friends! I'm back, albeit the use of an apparent, or unofficial, Doppelganger account. This account is the only I can log in....''

''I'll tell my story. I was logged out when I proceeded to change my password to a scramble. Unwisely, I also proceeded to not check remember me. I was logged out. I proceeded to make this account I'm using, which I trashed when Kfc1864 came back through Explorer. But Explorer, which was likely logging me in 'cause of a bug, also logged me out. Well. I told it. I hope people see this post and know the reason Kfc1864 is inactive. Goodbye.''

Former Kfc1864 user, now Kfc 18645   talk  14:16, 5 January 2008 (UTC).

{|

de:Benutzer:kfc1864 ko:사용자:kfc1864 fr:Utilisateur:kfc1864 simple:User:Kfc1864