User:Kfoltz2/North Creek High School/Emilyngu3 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User: Kfoltz2


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kfoltz2/North__Creek_High_School?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * North Creek High School

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * The Lead is the same as the original article. A contents box was added, because sections were added to the article that are not in the original article.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * The Lead is the same as in the original article, and is a good start, but it might be helpful to add some more information in the Lead, since you added more sections to the article,
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * It does not
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * It is not overly detailed, maybe add a few more sentences briefing the sections of the article that you added.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, I think it was helpful that you added sections to the article, since the originally article didn't have any sections, and was only a few sentences long. Another section you could add could be about Extracurriculars, or a section on Special recognitions and awards
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * No
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * No

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)
 * Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Yes
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)
 * Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes, the sections are well-written and easy to follow.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No major grammatical or spelling errors. I went in and made a few minor edits for capitalization and just rewording a few sentences to make it flow more smoothly.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes! I like the organization of the sections!