User:Kfox003/Cow Creek/Corgiflash4! Peer Review

General info
Kfox003
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kfox003/Cow_Creek?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template :Link to the current version:Cow Creek

Lead
In the draft of the article, the lead section isn't included. Is the section being kept or changed? The general information at the start of the article draft was very good and informative on what is going to be talked about.

Content
I thought you did an excellent job with your framework. Overall the topics were up to date and relevant to the article chosen and added information that was very useful to making the article better. I thought the paragraphs added were informative on restoration and general information about the creek. Additionally, I think maybe going in depth on the history of Cow Creek would be really interesting to learn about maybe as a third paragraph.

Tone and Balance
The overall tone was very neutral and wasn't biased or negative towards the information presented in the edits. The additional information was well articulated in not leaning into sides or groups.

Sources and References
I thought that all of your sources used were reliable and well organized in the resource section. The articles added to the references are current and well diverse to what you are talking about in the additional work added. The links added in the resources are available and work well.

Organization
Content that was added is well organized and clear to understand. I saw no spelling errors and thought that the sections highlight major points/information about Cow Creek. Great work!

Images and Media
No images were provided.

Overall Impressions
Overall I loved learning about the information provided in the original article and the additional information you provided. Furthermore, learning about the restoration of the riparian zone was very informative and helped me visualize the importance. To add on, the article is credibility is very good and helps the reader understand more information about Cow Creek.