User:Kfox003/Cow Creek/Mccrunchberrios Peer Review

General info
kfox003
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Kfox003/Cow Creek
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Cow Creek

Evaluate the drafted changes
The general information part of the article is well written and concise, it is easy to read and each sentence provides the information needed. Some of the sentences feel somewhat short but they still work. In the body section specifically the, riparian restoration portion some of the sentences could use more elaboration. When the river being contaminated is mentioned, what is contaminating it and maybe why it is bad should be mentioned. Like why is it so integral for the river to be cleaned up? In the section about the fishing maybe mention what specific species of fish can be found in the river. Or elaborate on the walleye. Is it the only fish that can be caught there? Is it native to the area? I think that there should also be a link leading to the walleye article of Wikipedia if there is one in order to add more background to the article. Overall it is very well done just a bit lacking in elaboration, but overall it is leagues above what it used to be which was completely empty. Great job!