User:Kgarvey6/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
 * Our class is inspired by the 100th anniversary of this amendment

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * It is a long lead but it is a lot of info in the article, so I would say so.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Yes.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * Concise yet has important details.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes.
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Yes.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * I do not consider my self-versed well enough in this topic to give a meaningful answer.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Yes.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * I did not see any.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * None that I noticed.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * I would say it makes people sympathetic towards women gaining the right to vote, but that's just because of the facts presented.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * I see a lot of reliable sources in the references.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes.
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes I see sources from last month.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * The ones I tried did.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * I would consider it a bit long, but it is clear.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * None that I noticed
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes. Very well organized

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Yes indeed
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Yes.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * I believe so.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * Very balanced.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * Not many, some incomplete comments about editing and numbers.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * Good - yes part of quite a few projects
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * We have not really discussed anything yet.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * Good
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * Presenting readers with a history of the 19th amendment
 * How can the article be improved?
 * Maybe more reliable info.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
 * Well-developed

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: