User:Kglvn

About Me
I enjoy playing sports, i've played many sports growing up, I did gymnastics and volleyball when I was younger and now I am in cross country, and track and field. In track my events are the 1600 meter, 800 meter, and my favorite event, the 3200 meter. Some hobbies of mine include knitting, hiking, and reading. I'm Mexican and love visiting Mexico in the summertime with my family. We usually go to Cozumel or Playa Del Carmen.

My Wikipedia interests
Some Wikipedia pinterests I might have in the future are information about crystals. I am interested in learning and about their metaphysical properties and how they could potentially assist you. Some believe crystals carry healing properties and allow positive energy to flow in and negative energy to flow out of your body

Article Evaluation
Tyler, the Creator is an artist I frequently listen to, so I decided to interpret the Tyler, the Creator article on Wikipedia, and found three aspects of it worth commenting on: the abundant amount of citations and its external articles, a neutral point of view, and lastly its under-represented section titled "Personal Life".

Voice
The article does a great job having a neutral tone throughout the text. There is no biased claims included in this article that I can find and that is impressive knowing some topics this article highlights over can be very controversial, for example the section titled "Controversy" which is rather long.

Personal Life
There is a lack of information about the artist's personal life on this page that is underrepresented and not as detailed as the other topics mentioned. I believe this section could be improved to be more detailed and contain more information. I can find more information for this section online rather easy or from my background knowledge that I could add to this section. This topic is also one of the smaller sections included in this Wikipedia article. For example, the section titled "Controversy" is one of the longest sections included, to which I believe is over-represented.

Summary
Overall, This wikipedia article is edited and produced very well. It was very well organized with many citations and links throughout that where useful for a reader to click on. The article had a neutral voice throughout with no biased claims. One thing I would improve in this article is the lack of information in the section titled "Personal Life" as it did not contain as much information as I would expect and the over-represented section titled "Controversy".