User:Khamilton88/Male Jewish Menstruation/Bdan2525 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Khamilton88


 * There is an article and no draft.
 * Jewish male menstruation

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead section:


 * The lead section is easy to understand, clearly illustrates the importance of the topic and summarizes the article and reflects it in great detail. Additionally, the lead section balances its approach to the article and does not give more weight to certain sections than others.

Notability:


 * The article meets Wikipedia’s notability requirements as it has “received significant covered in reliable sources that are independent of the subject”.

Structure and writing quality:


 * The sections are organized in a sensible order that introduces and relates the different origins and understandings of Jewish male menstruation. Additionally, the information in the article is relevant and clearly describes the topic.

Images and Media:


 * The article doesn't use any images or media. The addition of images and media would help to increase the clarity of the article and its educational value.

Balancing act:


 * The article presents the history of Jewish male menstruation in a representative way of its actual history. Additionally, each section is appropriate in its size and relates to the topic. Furthermore, the article reflects the perspectives represented in the history of Jewish male menstruation, but would benefit from the addition of case studies and information on how the practice ended. Lastly, the article does not attempt to convince readers to accept one particular point of view.

Neutral content:


 * The article is written in a neutral tone that exemplifies the requirements of Wikipedia. There are not examples in the article of words, phrase or claims that do not feel neutral. The perspective of the author cannot be determined by reading the article.

Reliable sources


 * All of the statements in the article are sourced, and the citations used are supported by appropriate and reliable references. Three of the references are from reputable journals, and the other reference is from the University of Queensland. The sources are neutral and are relatively recent in publication. Additionally, statements in the article are not too reliable on a single source. They are mainly cited from three of the four sources.