User:Khernandez210/Toyin Ojih Odutola/Hankhankwch Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * I am reviewing the article page written by Kylene Hernandez (Khernandez210).
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * User:Khernandez210/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes, the Lead part has been updated and clearly introduced who Toyin Ojih Odutola is.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes, the introductory sentence is straightforward telling what the article is about.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Yes, there doesn't seem to have description of major sections. However, there is a content box that directly link to each major section.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No, information given in lead has been discussed in detail later.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * Lead is concise with basic information that is necessary to know the topic.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, totally!!
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes, based on the date of cited source are closed to current date.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * No, all contents are relevant to the topic.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes, contents are neutral.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No, there were only the information provided without opinion.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No, the content provided in each section is balanced.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No, there were not any persuasion in the article.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes, contents are backed up by either Magazine articles or other websites
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes, they are.
 * Are the sources current?
 * Most of the are current, some of the needed to be verified.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes, links still work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, It is clear with information and easy to read.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No, the sentences in the paragraphs are smooth to read.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, all different sections contain important detail that reflect the major points of the topic.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * So far, the images haven't been added to the article. But to my understanding, there will be images in final version.
 * Are images well-captioned? Not yet but will be.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Yes, the article as a whole definitely looks even more intact with added detail.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * It provided more details about early life and career of the person and explained how the person become who she is today.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * It would be great if some of artworks are provide along with concise description.