User:Khoamac/sandbox

Operation Golden Dragon outline
Operation Golden Dragon was a marine training exercise in 1973 combined by the United States of America and South Korea naval troops.

The operation was held outside of Yang Po Ri island, South Korea.

The exercise was designed to train the South Korea's naval troops and prepare South Korea for any attack from North Korea or Japan.

Naval Ships
USS Blue Ridge III (LCC-19): USS Blue Ridge is the third Blue Ridge-class ship built by Philadelphia Naval Shipyard. The ship was sponsored by Mrs. Gretchen T.Byrd. Captain Kent J. Carroll was put in command of the Blue Ridge (LCC-19).

USS Bausell (DD-845)

USS Gurke (DD-783)

USS Leonard F. Mason (DD-852): USS Leonard F. Mason is a Gearing-class destroyer built by Fore River Shipbuilding of company Bethlehem Steel Company, Quincy, Massachusetts. Mrs. Hillery Hillary Mason was the sponsor of the ship. S. D. B. Merril was first put in commanding the destroyer.

USS Tripoli LPH-10: USS Tripoli is the Iwo Jima-class ship build by Ingalls Shipbuilding Corp. Mrs. Jane Cates was the sponsor of the ship. Captain Henry Suerstedt Jr. was the first commander of the USS Tripoli.

Wiki project
Operation Golden Dragon

_First, I will find some reliable sources about the time frame during the operaion.

_Then I will find the reason why the American and Korea join force for this operation.

_After that, I will find information about the forces that were in the operation such as naval ships, air forces, troops, etc.

_If anything happened during the operation, I will try to find information on that.

_I will also do some researches on North Korea's reactions about the operation and how South Korea deal with it since they were at war at the time.

_Finally, I am going to organize my information into different sections, and start drafting my work.

Links: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Golden_Dragon

Tasks: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_history/Open_tasks#TASKS

Sources: _Kinryu-GO:Operation Golden Dragon (E-book) _

Article evaluation
'''Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?''' Not everything is relevant to the topic but there are some important information that I could use about diving underwater. There are too many different information about the same topic, it can literally lead to many different topics that are not irrelevant. For example, I want to know about how underwater cave diving work, the article not only talks about that but also talks about free diving, and history of diving.

'''Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?''' Yes, the article is neutral. It only states facts and researches about underwater diving.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? I feel like all the viewpoints are equally informed. The organization of the article is clear and easy to read. Moreover, even some viewpoints does not show a deep view, it still links to other articles which talks deeply about that viewpoint.

'''Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?''' The article, that I read, has 158 references and 3 sources. All the links work and the sources do support the article closely.

'''Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?''' Yes, each fact does come from a reliable reference and is linked. Most of the facts come from different books about diving.

'''Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?''' The article seems to be updated every year. There are references from 2010 to 2016, and there are references from year 1990 or even sooner.

'''Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?''' There are conversations about citations and putting in pages number so it is easier for reader to find information.

'''How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?''' The article is rated "featured". It is a part of 3 Wiki Projects: WikiProject Scuba diving, WikiProject Oceans, WikiProject Lakes.

How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class or the way you've seen it talked about in other spaces? It shows different sides of the main topic and it also links to different article. It is completely neutral and verified information. It is well organized and reviewed by many people.

'''What I found interesting about the talk page?"' I found the talk page is really interesting. They care about every single small detail. They not only fix your citations, informtaion, etc. They also fix your choose of image, your organization, etc.

Khoamac (talk) 04:49, 11 July 2018 (UTC)