User:Khook2/Oliver E. Williamson/Lauren2024 Peer Review

General info
Khook2
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Khook2/Oliver E. Williamson
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Oliver E. Williamson

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: The lead of the article is informative without being too long or overly detailed. The first sentence captures the main objective of the article. I think that a brief summary of each section could be added to the lead if it is concise, just so there is more information about what is to follow in the article. Then, users could know that the article covers the information they are searching for.

Content: The content of the article all appears to be relevant and up to date. The Personal Life section could use some added information, if more information can be found. The rest of the article seems to have all the information necessary. I do not think that this article addresses equity gaps.

Tone and Balance: All of the content in the article seems to be neutral and free of bias. The tone does not appear to be persuasive. Everything in the article seems to be based on facts.

Sources and References: Most of the information in each section has sources that it is linked to. However, the Awards section seems to be missing the sources where that information was found. I think that should be updated to have sources. The links of sources that I checked worked. The sources are by multiple different authors.

Organization: I think that the article has a good flow and the sections make it easier to read or find what information you are looking for. The Personal Life section seems to be thrown in the article, so it might need to be moved to after the Life and Career section. I did not notice any spelling or grammatical errors in the article.

Images and Media: I think that the pictures in the article are great. They add information to the article and show what it is talking about.

Overall Impressions: I think that this article has little to improve on, just some minor tweaks. This is a great article and what has been added improves the article itself and makes it better for future users.