User:Khyamamoto/Traditional Hawaiian games/Theaphillips Peer Review

General info
(Khyamamoto)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Khyamamoto/'Ulu Maika
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead
The lead section starts with a great introductory sentence that clearly explains the topic to the reader. The lead section also properly describes the article's major sections of history, gameplay, and equipment. The lead is concise and does not include information that is not present in the article.

Content
The content in this article is perfectly relevant to the topic and is up to date. There is no content in the article that is missing or that does not belong. The article deals with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps by focusing on a topic related to underrepresented populations. Overall, the content of the article is great and nicely explains each part of the topic.

Tone and Balance
The content of this article is neutral, and does not share any claims that are heavily biased toward a particular opinion or position. The article does a great job explaining each part of the traditional Hawaiian game without over-representing or under-representing a specific viewpoint. The content does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of a position and instead aims to educate the reader on the details surrounding the game.

Sources and References
The content of the article seems to be supported by reliable secondary sources of information, and the content accurately reflects what the cited sources discuss. The sources referenced are thorough and current and relevant to the topic. The sources also seem to be written by a diverse spectrum of authors. The sources provided seem to be the best and most relevant sources available on this topic. The links to each source work.

Organization
This article is very well written, and is detailed while remaining concise and easy to read. Each section of the article is organized nicely and includes relevant small details. The article does not have grammar or spelling errors, and the sections of the article do a great job in outlining the major points of the topic.

Images and Media
The image included in the article is perfectly relevant to the topic and captioned. It enhances the reader's understanding of the topic by providing a visual for the stones that are described throughout the article. The image is properly captioned and cited and it adheres to Wikipedia's copyright regulations. The image is at the top of the page, which is helpful because it immediately provides the reader with examples of the stones at the beginning of the article.

For New Articles Only
This article meets Wikipedia's Notability requirements because it has a few reliable secondary sources that it references on the topic. For such a specific topic, the list of sources seems to accurately represent the literature that is available on the topic. The article properly cites the sources throughout the paragraphs, and section headings are nicely formatted. The article could be improved by linking to more articles within the text.

Overall impressions
The article is great, easy to read, and concise. It provides all of the necessary information to understand the topic of ʻUlu maika while also including smaller details that create balance in the article. The format, sources, and neutral tone are all sufficient and create a well-rounded article. Great job!