User:Khyatipatel98/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article

 * Women in Science: (Women in science)
 * As a woman in STEM, I thought it would be interesting to read about the contributions of other women to our field.

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * The Lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic.
 * The Lead includes a brief description of the article's major sections.
 * The Lead includes information that is not present in the article.
 * The Lead is concise and proves to be a good introduction to the rest of the article.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * The article's content is relevant to the topic.
 * The content appears somewhat up-to-date, however has not updated the number of women to have been awarded Nobel Peace Prizes since 2010.
 * There does not appear to be content that is missing or content that does not belong.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * The article is neutral.
 * There are no claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position.
 * There do not appear to be viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented.
 * The article does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * All facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information.
 * The sources are thorough - i.e. They reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * A few links were checked- some of them worked, but some of then did not. This may reflect the accuracy of the article, but also may be due to old websites.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * The article is well-written - i.e. It is concise, clear, and easy to read.
 * The article does not seem to have any grammatical or spelling errors.
 * The article is well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic.

Images and Media
Guiding questions:


 * The article includes a few images that enhance understanding of the topic.
 * The images are well-captioned with sources cited.
 * All images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations.
 * The images are laid out in a visually appealing way.

Checking the talk page
Guiding questions:


 * Conversations that are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic include discussions involving more women to include in the Wikipedia article, additional contributions of women that have already been discussed, how to better structure the article (in terms of format), whether or not the article has a gender-feministic agenda behind its presence, etc.
 * This article is rated B-Class, High Importance for the WikiProject History of Science; rated B-Class, High Importance for the WikiProject Women's History; rated B-Class, Top Importance for the WikiProject Women Scientists.
 * Although we've never directly discussed Women in Stem in class, this article talks about the contributions of women to science and the struggle for women to be allowed in colleges.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * The article's overall status seems to be strong, as all sources are cited and has had several contributors.
 * The strengths of this article include several citations and multiple contributors.
 * The article maintains many restatements- these can be removed or better formatted.
 * The article is well-developed.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes ~


 * Link to feedback: