User:Khyhvc/sandbox

No there were a lot of facts about other people who have written different works that disproved Newton's theories. Yes the article itself is pretty neutral, but it has a lot of facts that do not really relate to Newton. Yes the links do work, and yes the source does support the claims in the articles. A lot of facts is referred to books that have been written, and I am not sure if the sources are biased.
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Sources for Xenotransplantation

 * The Transplant Imaginary: Mechanical Hearts, Animal Parts, and Moral Thinking in Highly Experimental Science
 * Lesley Alexandrea Sharp
 * ISBN: 9780520277960
 * Publisher: University of California Press
 * Published in 2014
 * Citation URL: http://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB001553475/

What I am adding to the Xenotransplantation page
In the 1960s, many organs came from the chimpanzees, and were transferred into people that were deathly ill, and in turn, did not live much longer afterwards. This brings up the thought of ethicality of using humans and animals as subjects. The scientists that are behind these works have a desire to help those that are in pain to alleviate their suffering. The application of the four bioethics principal is found to be everywhere because it is now standardized in the moral conducts of a laboratory. The four principles emphasize on the informed consent, the Hippocratic Oath to do no harm, apply one's skill to help others, and protecting the rights of others to quality care.

The process of transferring organs comes from those that are willing to donate their own organs which can be seen to be as "extraordinary acts of altruistic strangers". There are many ethical dilemmas such as how to distribute the scarce resource of the transplant medication, and Xenotransplant as well as artificial organs are shown to be able to clear the moral slate.

Guidelines to Xenotransplantation given by Governments Requires Patient informed consent
Problems with xenotransplantation is that even though it has future medical benefits, it also has the serious risk of introducing and spreading the infectious diseases, into the human population. There have been guidelines that have been drafted by the government that have the purpose of forming the foundation of infectious disease surveillance. In the United Kingdom, the guideline that were introduced state that first, "the periodic provision of bodily samples that would then be archived for epidemiological purposes;" second, "post-mortem analysis in case of death, the storage of samples post-mortem, and the disclosure of this agreement to their family;" third, "refrain from donating blood, tissue or organs;" fourth, "the use of barrier contraception when engaging in sexual intercourse;" fifth, keep both name and current address on register and to notify the relevant health authorities when moving abroad;" and lastly "divulge confidential information, including one's status as a xenotranplant recipient to researchers, all health care professionals from whom one seeks professional services, and close contacts such as current and future sexual partners." With these guidelines in place the patient has to abide to these rules until either their lifetime or until the government determines that there is no need for public health safe guards.

Peer Review byAshtonnd33 (talk) 16:34, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
What does the draft do well? The draft clearly lists the sources found in relation to this article Changes: I believe this sentence is missing the word are : “The scientists that are behind these works have a desire to help those that are in pain to alleviate those that are suffering” Are there sub sections to this article, I would recommend giving more background if it is not already there.

What’s the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? Based on what I have seen, the most important thing is simply expanding the context to the reading, although what is there is valuable information.

I really appreciate that the sources are clearly listed for future reference or for other viewers, so they can be kept track of and not lost, even when they are not currently being used for cited information. I think I might also list any sources I find that I think could be useful in my sandbox so that I can keep them organized.

Thank you for responding to my sandbox page. The suggestions that you have made are very helpful for me. I will make changes and add in the subsections to the sentence that you have listed below, and I will try to expand the context to the reading, but I am not sure on how much I can expand on. I am glad that you were able to gain some insight from the layout of my sandbox. -Kevin Yn