User:Kiara44D/Dopamine agonist/Nguyenmt1732 Peer Review

General info
User:Kiara44D
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Kiara44D/Dopamine agonist
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Dopamine agonist

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Hello!

For your draft, I suggest that you use bold or italics to differentiate between what is in the original and what is your thoughts. I would also like to know where you wanted to insert this paragraph in the original article. You should also look for more sources, since having more sources will be able to help you gather more information to add. A good source for secondary sources would be the UAB online library. You can click on the article tab and search for anything related to your topic. I do like the points that you brought up in your draft, but it kind of felt like a summary of the original article. Great work though!