User:Kiara44D/Dopamine agonist/Ngwinn Peer Review

General info
(Kiara44D)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Dopamine agonist
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Dopamine agonist

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead


 * 1) Yes, the lead has been updated to reflect the changes made throughout the article.
 * 2) Yes, the lead does include an inclusive introductory paragraph.
 * 3) Yes, in the lead section, it briefly mentions all the disorders dopamine agonists are used for various medical disorders.
 * 4) The pharmacology section is the only section in the lead that is not (arguably) specifically mentioned.
 * 5) The lead is concise and mentions all the major sections in the article.

 Content 


 * 1) Yes, all the content added is aligned with the topic at hand that it's added under.
 * 2) Two of the sections that have been added have a date of publication that's over five years old. This could arguably cause some concern, given that there might have been some updates since then.
 * No, all the content added is relevant to the article's topic.
 * 1) I do not think the topic of the article requires this specific information to be included.

 Tone and balance 

1 and 2. The content added remains neutral, and there aren't any claims that appear heavily biased.

3. In this instance, given it's a strictly informational article about a certain agonist, I don't believe this part would need to be added

4. No, the content added remains neutral

 Sources and References 


 * 1) Yes, all of the content added does come from a credible, reliable source.
 * 2) Yes, all the information cited in this article is accurately reflected.
 * 3) Yes, for example, one of the sources is published in the National Library of Medicine, which is a highly credible source and provides a plethora of reliable information.
 * 4) Only one addition in the article was within a 5-year time span.
 * 5) Yes.
 * 6) Perhaps retrieving information from labs of accredited university labs could add diversity to the cited sources.
 * 7) Yes, all the links do work properly.

 Organization 

1, 2, and 3. The information added was well-researched and written, free from any major or minor grammatical errors, and is correctly organized under each section.

 Images and Media 

My peer did not add any additional photos.