User:KiateKat/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Dura-Europos

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

This article is the umbrella article for my article that I will be updating during this class. This matters overall because this site has so many important archeological discoveries and breakthroughs. My first impression was that this article was very well-written and had exceedingly more information given than the stub articles that I read.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The Dura-Europos article is the best example of a Wikipedia article I have seen so far. There is the perfect amount of information, presented neutrally, with tons of credible sources to back it up. Every artifact mentioned has an attached picture on the side to allow readers to visualize what they are reading about. In addition, the article contains correct grammar, well-organized content, and a look at every view on the site. It discusses both the ancient history of Dura-Europos and what the site looks like in modern-day. It is clear that this article has been worked on by many knowledgeable people, as I can't really locate any point in the article that I think should be changed.