User:Kikinunez/sandbox

- Article possible edits

Look into the Age of enlightenment to see the connection to women in science. After possibly clarify the connection to avoid confusion or misinterpretation. With the section of gender imbalance the third sentence needs rephrasing it is unclear to what the previous author was trying to say. Also it must be noted the difference of encouragements children receive when being taught during hands on activities. The section where the girls  the confidence is being questioned is clearly not neutral. It shines women in the unfit position that our emotions that we have cripples women to achieve the goals. This could be proven or disproven by the data on the hormonal changes through middle school. It almost feels that the previous author is saying that the girls at are at a constant need of reassurance in what they are doing in their possible  career paths. The section of gender imbalance needs more information. It needs to show the effects of the imbalance in the real world. Also it might need more than one example with a reliable reference. It is a good idea to look into the unequal representation of female engineers.Then it could be a close transition to the next section of the inequality of the pay. I appreciate the first direct transition or link to the gender gap. Make sure to add more women to the underrepresentation in science awards, possibly make it longer. Reference the Tem pipeline in the confidence paragraph. Figure out a way to make the gender and work more bias, it is making emn seen unfit.Look into the psychological effects of the phenomenon of the stem fields. This article has most references to up to date very few in the late nineteen hundreds. The talk page has issues with the layout of the article, and all terms must be specific for the article in particular. This was clearly narrowed for people in the united states so the title like someones says must be changed to something more relevant. An option is to change it to “ women in stem in the united states”. The is a debate to broadening the continent to a more world view, making it more united.The article aligns to previous readings that we read earlier in this class with the scientific revolution. It logically makes sense to connect info from the article to the  class readings. The article was rated a class article, so it also needs room for improvement. It has been on the road to its complete development. This articles also has many wiki projects all relating to something in the social sciences, stem ,and women articles in general.

~kiki