User:Kileycox7/sandbox

Article Evaluation
-Citations work and there are a lot of them, though there still are some missing. -Does remain neutral. -Some facts are cited from biased sources but the way they are used in the article is as just facts and not to persuade. -Some of the facts on each country and what its position is on animal testing are out of date. -The article lacks any history about cosmetic animal testing. -This article is rated as Start-Class and also as Top-Importance because it says that Wiki is trying to get more information on Animal Rights in order to support it. -There is discussion on the Talk page, though not a lot, and is mainly about how the article can improve and what things needed to be added.