User:Kilmer-san/Sandbox

Vandalism warning Article adds text onto the end of the message instead of "Thank you"



In general, I find the tagging to be overdone in Wikipedia. A better option is to nuke the unsourced material. Sometimes is warranted, I don't mean that it is always a bad idea. But it is overdone.

I very often see completely preposterous claims tagged with, usually because an editor is being excessively cautious. Be bold. :)


 * --Jimbo

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. What does this look like.

What does this look like.

What does this look like.

What does this look like.
$$What does this look like.$$

What does this look like.

--Fireproeng 14:04, 9 March 2007 (UTC)What does this look like.


 * 1) REDIRECT What does this look like.

What does this look like.

W hat does this look like.

popping up a box saying an article or section has not been verified and may not be reliable. ,

{| class="messagebox" style="max-width: 45em; background: #FFF0D9; text-align: center;" - |   - | This  may contain original research or unverified claims. Please help Wikipedia by adding references. See the talk page for details. - |}

Usage
The default words "article or section" are replaceable: produces: A date parameter can also be used to inform other editors of the time the tag has been in place: produces:

{{Original research|article|date={{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}} } This template will categorize articles into Category:Articles that may contain original research.