User:Kilopi/PROD log

This is a log of all proposed deletion tags applied or endorsed by this user using Twinkle's PROD module.

If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under CSD U1.

October 2011

 * 1) LTPT: PROD; notified  01:08, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: non-notable protologism
 * 3) Essentia: PROD; notified  22:49, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: Pure advertising with no evidence of notability

November 2011

 * 1) Trelys: PROD; notified  17:09, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: tagged 2-4 years as unsourced, advert, coi, and notability
 * 3) Socialtyze: PROD; notified  01:42, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: non-notable company
 * 5) Galingayle: PROD; notified  08:45, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) * Reason: So, has this been built yet? I'm seeing a lot of future tense and promotional language, but not much in the direction of sourced notability.
 * 7) Akhtaboot: PROD; notified  02:45, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) * Reason: blatantly self-promotional with no acceptable version to revert to.
 * 9) E-Leather: PROD; notified  06:18, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) * Reason: consists mostly of grandiose claims sourced to the (non-notable) company's own website
 * 11) Connection Technology Center: PROD; notified  22:54, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) * Reason: non-notable company, full of unsourced puffery
 * 13) InfoSight: PROD; notified  08:13, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 14) * Reason: unsourced article about non-notable corp
 * 15) BigTip: PROD; notified  01:36, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 16) * Reason: non-notable company; no third party references other than routine SEC filings
 * 17) Canadian Residential Inspection Services: PROD; notified  20:50, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 18) * Reason: Despite an effort by another editor to remove the more blatant self-promotion, there is not enough notability here for a viable article.
 * 19) Sosign Interactive: PROD; notified  21:06, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 20) * Reason: Obvious spam without evidence of notability
 * 21) Global Relations Forum: PROD; notified  06:44, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 22) * Reason: No independent sources showing notability. It's not even clear what if anything this org actually does. Also WP:CHIMP.
 * 23) Mike Kortoci: PROD; notified  07:00, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 24) * Reason: Promotional and non-notable. Only independent source is a blurb, not an article.
 * 25) Signazon.com: PROD; notified  23:06, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 26) * Reason: blatantly promotional with no significant independent coverage or evidence of notability
 * 27) Aternity Inc: PROD; notified  23:19, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 28) * Reason: Reads like typical paid editing. Grossly overstates notability by referencing insignificant industry awards and misinterprets the few independent sources to avoid being speedied at NPP.

December 2011

 * 1) Jason Bailey (CEO): PROD; notified  23:20, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: Total puff piece. No credible sources and probably not notable.
 * 3) Sun Broadcast Group: PROD; notified  23:22, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: Spammy promotion of very new, likely non-notable company, sourced only by press releases.
 * 5) Grocery trading: PROD; notified  03:11, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) * Reason: Apparently meant to be some sort of ad for a way for grocery stores to sell to other grocery stores. But it's very confusing as written and can't be improved without credible sources about the practice.
 * 7) The Kearny Alliance: PROD; notified  15:50, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) * Reason: Lack of independent coverage suggests the org fails WP:N. Even if kept would need to be redone from scratch. The buzzwords, flowery mission statements, and promotion for various entities obscure communication to the extent that after reading it, I still have no idea what they actually do.
 * 9) Kawasaki brute force 750i 4x4: PROD; notified  20:58, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) * Reason: Just a list of specs from kawasaki.com. I'd tag it copyvio except I don't think a bare list of specs is copyrightable in the first place.

January 2012

 * 1) Wherefore Art?: PROD; notified  07:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: unsourced permastub
 * 3) The Education Foundation of Sarasota County, Inc.: PROD; notified  16:26, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: no notability, just a mission statement

February 2012

 * 1) American Home Inspector Directory: PROD; notified  23:50, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: No independent sources to show notability and it reads too much like an ad.
 * 3) Mimeo.com Inc.: PROD; notified  03:30, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: Company may be borderline notable, but this reads like a press release and I can't how to convert it into an encyclopedia article.
 * 5) Sensory room: PROD; notified  21:42, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) * Reason: Single 19-word sentence cited to a WP:QS.
 * 7) Favourite Website Awards: PROD; notified  05:24, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) * Reason: Unsourced and with no credible evidence of notability
 * 9) Stig Harder: PROD; notified  17:28, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) * Reason: unduly promotional with no credible sourcing for claims of notability
 * 11) Litfuse: PROD; notified  17:31, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) * Reason: ad agency with obvious WP:COI and no verifiable notability
 * 13) Agile Commerce: PROD; notified  04:18, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 14) * Reason: WP:BOLLOCKS
 * 15) Mporia: PROD; notified  05:46, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 16) * Reason: No evidence of notability

March 2012

 * 1) Georgetown International Graduate Students Organization: PROD; notified  14:42, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: Student organizations of this sort are usually not notable. Article is unsourced (other than links to its own website and facebook profile) and written by its own president.

April 2012

 * 1) E-Rankings: PROD; notified  02:10, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: Not notable. Only independent source is a topseos ranking that fails WP:CORPDEPTH and even then fails verification as E-rankings is "not yet rated" with three 1-star user reviews.
 * 3) Holbi: PROD; notified  02:16, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: Not notable. No references, all links are to the homepages of company properties.
 * 5) Vision 21: PROD; notified  23:59, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) * Reason: No evidence of notability.
 * 7) Rene Gaudette: PROD; notified  18:19, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) * Reason: Very unencyclopedic in tone, stating WP:FRINGE claims as if they were facts so obvious that no source was needed, or that a plug for a self-published one would suffice.
 * 9) Marketing IQ: PROD; notified  21:39, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) * Reason: No refs, no notability. WP is not a business directory.

May 2012

 * 1) Alma De Agave: PROD; notified  02:13, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: Most of the text is promotional or unverifiable. No credible sources.

June 2012

 * 1) International Institute of Coaching: PROD; notified  14:01, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: Spammy, based entirely on IIC's own site.
 * 3) Bob Nilsen: PROD; notified  19:49, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: Removing the unsourceable puffery would effectively blank the page.
 * 5) Joseph Scarpinito: PROD; notified  20:49, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) * Reason: Promotional, poorly sourced, and of doubtful notability
 * 7) Solace Management: PROD; notified  05:13, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) * Reason: Unsourced and non-notable
 * 9) Teatown Communications Group: PROD; notified  05:15, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) * Reason: unsourced and non-notable
 * 11) Yeh Hai Cricket Pakistan: PROD; notified  15:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) * Reason: A Facebook page, with no evidence of independent coverage, fails notability guideline.
 * 13) Save Buriganga: PROD; notified  20:17, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * 14) * Reason: Two unsourced sentences about an activist group with ... a video camera, a facebook page, and an email list.

July 2012

 * 1) Compliance 360: PROD; notified  20:04, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: With only run-of-the-mill mentions, routine listings, and press releases, appears to fail WP:NCORP.
 * 3) MetricStream: PROD; notified  20:05, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: Effectively unsourced since creation. No improvement since tagged in Sept, and no sources of significant depth found in search. Seems to fail WP:NCORP.
 * 5) Easy2comply: PROD; notified  03:14, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) * Reason: No reliable, independent sources.
 * 7) MEGA International: PROD; notified  03:15, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) * Reason: Unsourced and excessively promotional.
 * 9) Blackrock Developments: PROD; notified  20:20, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) * Reason: An obviously non-notable Canadian homebuilder. Sources prove it legally exists, and that's about it.
 * 11) International Sign Association: PROD; notified  19:46, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) * Reason: There's no article here, just a mission statement and a plug for the subject's website. If it's notable, WP:Blow it up and start over; if it's not notable, blow it up and don't start over.
 * 13) Mo Anderson: PROD; notified  02:15, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * 14) * Reason: Resume of non-notable businesswoman full of unverifiable claims.

August 2012

 * 1) KrNfx: BLP PROD; notified  18:14, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Reeps One: BLP PROD; notified  18:16, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

September 2012

 * 1) OpinionLab: PROD; notified  08:55, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: Pure advertising, with no independent sourcing
 * 3) Statsit: PROD; notified  23:43, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: 15 employee "social media insight" company with a joke democratic workplace award
 * 5) Prominent Placement: PROD; notified  01:17, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) * Reason: Typical paid editing: A puff piece on a non-notable company sourced entirely by press releases.
 * 7) Schneider Associates: PROD; notified  02:04, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) * Reason: Ad for a non-notable PR firm. Sourced primarily to press releases, with a mention of a human interest story in a local paper.
 * 9) John E. Barrett: PROD; notified  06:14, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) * Reason: Delusional puffery. He's supposedly won "every major photographic award" ... except for any of the ones major enough to have a Wikipedia page. The NYT and Smithsonian "references" doesn't mention him at all outside the photo credits.
 * 11) Latista Technologies: PROD; notified  00:25, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) * Reason: Unsourced and promotional
 * 13) Safe-In-Sound Award: PROD; notified  20:05, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
 * 14) * Reason: Standard spam. Lots of exlinks, first person descriptions and calls to action, but no independent sources.

November 2012

 * 1) Canada Foundation for Innovation: PROD; notified  01:13, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: Just a mission statement. No encyclopedic content and no sources.
 * 3) SurePath Financial Solutions: PROD; notified  03:35, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: Promotional, probable COI from only major author, no independent references that even mention SurePath.
 * 5) Auctiva: PROD; notified  22:11, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) * Reason: Advert for non-notable company. No independent sources.
 * 7) Arkamys: PROD; notified  22:16, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) * Reason: Advertisement with no independent sources
 * 9) Blue Bite: PROD; notified  16:02, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) * Reason: Promotional article sourced exclusively to press releases

December 2012

 * 1) Canadian Institute of Public Health Inspectors: PROD; notified  21:56, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: Permastub of non-notable org. Despite 5 yrs, has never had a source other than its own website.
 * 3) National Association of Children's Hospitals and Related Institutions: PROD; notified  11:03, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: No encyclopedic content, just a mission statement.
 * 5) Online lottery: PROD; notified  12:20, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) * Reason: Should have been speedied as spam propped up with a few fictitious references. The spam has been removed, but not a single sentence of what remains was written in good faith.

January 2013

 * 1) Futures Truth magazine: PROD; notified  22:37, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: pure advertising, unsourced for 5 years

March 2013

 * 1) BWIC: PROD; notified  18:30, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: A very non-notable community organization written about by one of its founders. Domain expired last year and the last message to their yahoo group was in 2010.

May 2013

 * 1) Goodmorning Technology: PROD; notified  15:38, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: puff piece for nn corp
 * 3) AbsolutData Research & Analytics: PROD; notified  15:54, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: G11 territory if it was new. There are less promotional versions in the history, but no sources.
 * 5) Wise Thoughts: PROD; notified  15:27, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) * Reason: unsourced since 2009, no indication of notability
 * 7) Fresh Healthy Vending: PROD; notified  03:52, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) * Reason: Looks to be a non-notable company. Only source is a press release. Legislation can be summarized as FHV supports bills restricting their competition from unhealthy vending.

June 2013

 * 1) ITAMCO: PROD; notified  11:28, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: Removing vandalism yields a very short, unsourced stub of questionable notability.

July 2013

 * 1) Kasim Kasuri: BLP PROD; notified  18:45, 19 July 2013 (UTC)