User:King666Field/sandbox

== Greetings from King666Field! == Hello Everyone! This is a test page for King666Field! Welcome any comment!Paragraph: Set the style of your text. For example, make a header or plain paragraph text. You can also use it to offset block quotes.

A : Highlight your text, then click here to format it with bold, italics, etc. The “More” options allows you to underline (U), cross-out text ( S ), add code snippets ( { } ), change language keyboards (Aあ), and clear all formatting ( ⃠ ).

Links: Highlight text and push this button to make it a link. The Visual Editor will automatically suggest related Wikipedia articles for that word or phrase. This is a great way to connect your article to more Wikipedia content. You only have to link important words once, usually during the first time they appear. If you want to link to pages outside of Wikipedia (for an “external links” section, for example) click on the “External link” tab.

Cite: The citation tool in the Visual Editor helps format your citations. You can simply paste a DOI or URL, and the Visual Editor will try to sort out all of the fields you need. Be sure to review it, however, and apply missing fields manually (if you know them). You can also add books, journals, news, and websites manually. That opens up a quick guide for inputting your citations. Once you've added a source, you can click the “re-use” tab to cite it again.

Bullets: To add bullet points or a numbered list, click here.

Insert: This tab lets you add media, images, or tables.

Ω: This tab allows you to add special characters, such as those found in non-English words, scientific notation, and a handful of language extensions.

Information Privacy
Content: The content contains mainly three parts: what is information privacy, how could privacy concerns happen and what needs to be done to improve privacy security, and it basically gives an understandable overview to people who never touch upon this topic before. However, the content in section 2 (Information types) is insufficient since the editor gives little explanation or example to each section. For example, for the "political" sub-section, the editor makes little explanations on how political information privacy is formed, as well as the effects that would bring to general public. The link to "secret ballot" contains many distracting information that is irrelevant to information privacy. Also, some references could only date back to 2013, which needs to be updated as well. Although the content covers basic aspects of information privacy, this page needs more supplementary and updated information.

Tone: The tone of this article is neutral. There is no obvious viewpoints in the whole article. Also, for reference, the editor provides a variety of links for further information. However, some viewpoints are underrepresented; for example, in section 2, the educational information types are not recognized for full awareness by the public.

Source: The sources are reliable but many of them are "ancient" links that might have trivial influence on current understanding to information privacy. There are no obvious biased sources. Many sources are cited from official government documents or conference meetings. The information provided could be found in the reference of the sources.

Talk pages: The discussions mainly focus on how to supplement the content, debates on certain terms and pointing out mistakes/negligence of this article. This article belongs to three Wiki-projects and is high-rating.

Data Retention
Content: The content contains two parts: the concept of data retention and the representations of data retention policy from different countries. It basically gives an overview of data retention policy and enables people to inspect on the policy from particular countries. For some countries which are relatively mature in data retention policy, such as the UK and the United States, the editor offers more details on its information. However, many data retention policies from other countries have not been updated for years. Also, the data retention policy lacks of details in the description towards some small countries. Besides, the major effects of data retention policy are seldom addressed in the article. More supplementary and updated information is needed.

Tone: The tone of this article is neutral. There is no obvious viewpoints in the whole article. Also, for reference, the editor provides a variety of links for further information.

Sources: The sources are reliable. The sources could traceback to the data retention policy document from different governments or conference meetings. However, some links contain foreign languages that might be difficult for some readers to verify or explore the further information. There is no obvious biased sources.

Talk pages: The talk page only contains two links-modified assertion. No discussions on the content of the article go on its talk page. The article is rated differently in different Wiki-projects. For example, in Wiki-project European Union, it's rated as low-importance, but in Wiki-project Pirate Politics, it is rated as high-importance.

Citation Exercise
Privacy has been an increasing concern for citizens, governments, businesses and academics in recent years. Besides, privacy is unequal in distribution among different social actors and the production and management of privacy might create imbalance on social status and power.