User:KingRice27/Russian Mafia/DylanRoh Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

KingRice27


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:KingRice27/Russian Mafia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Russian mafia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

First off I think these additions could really help the article and its full understanding. I think the lead section is very good, it gets straight to the point and it's simple. Most importantly it flows and all makes sense. I like how you elaborated on everything you said, and have good sources to back everything up. I also like how clear it was and what points you were immediately making. The content is good and all up to date. It stays neutral through all of the points made. The article body was another well executed area of this article. Just like your lead section it flows very well and all makes sense. There is no information missing and everything works together to help it all sound good and make sense. I like how you kept elaborating and talked about what happened after 1945. The second section is also a good addition because it gives the reader a better idea to understand how big the mafia is and how many people work for them. The only thing I would've done differently is that I would've added the numbers from now and added those to it. It could've gave a reader too see how much it's really grown since the start of the mafia.