User:Kingwhale16/Rungano Nyoni/Gossipgirl123456 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing: Kingwhale16
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Rungano Nyoni

Lead evaluation:
The Lead section is a good, concise intro to the filmmaker. It is a well-structured brief description of the article's major sections. The information in the Lead section is later referenced again in the Awards section, therefore the information it includes is already present in the article (as it should be).

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation
I think that you should ensure that you avoid any writing that seems as if it may come from opinion by attributing statements to the person who made it (ie. quotes from the filmmaker). Other than that, I think that the content is high quality, relevant and up to date.

Tone and balance evaluation
This article is neutral, and the information does not seem to be biased in any way.

Sources and references evaluation
It seems that your sources are reliable and all of your information is backed by citations. I would only suggest that you double check that your references are structured correctly (the actual citations are proper), as Wikipedia makes them for you and sometimes it's missing information (article title, source title, date, retrieved from, etc).

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
I think that the 'Biography' section is pretty large, and could probably be broken down into sections (Early Life, Career, Education, etc). In addition, the Film subheadings should probably be italicized as they are all the names of films. However, overall, there aren't any major grammatical or spelling errors immediately visible - you should always double check though!

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

New Article Evaluation/Overall Evaluation
I think that this article check's all the New Article Evaluation boxes. The content is relevant and up to date, well cited and well written. I think that the article could be improved in it's organization, as the Biography section is slightly overwhelming and could be broken down. In addition, the filmography section is a bit lengthy. Overall, this is a great article that only needs a few minor revisions to make the information more easily readable.