User:Kirke1221/Eileithyia/Scorpiohistory Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kirke1221


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Kirke1221/Eileithyia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Eileithyia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:

The article mentions sections about the cult of Eileithyia, maybe you could consider adding a sentence or two about that into the lead of the article.

Content:

I didn't see a lot of new added information, but you added sources which shows that all evidence is backed up with appropriate information. The use of hyperlinks is very well done, and I think makes the article a lot easier to comprehend.

Tone:

The tone that is used is very neutral and does not guide the reader to view one side as more correct than another.

Organization:

The article is organized in a very clear and strong way. I would maybe consider moving the Genealogy section from the original article upwards a little bit, since you could tie it in a really nice way with Origins perhaps. The content overall has no grammatical errors, and the sentence structure is very concise and easy to understand, I like that the origins section goes in chronological order as well.

Media:

I understand that it might be difficult to find images or media, but I recommend that if you are able to find any to insert them. I think it would help the article look more friendly, and make it easier to digest.