User:Kirklandcb/Caatinga parakeet/Gmmuell Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

kirklandcb


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Kirklandcb/Caatinga parakeet/Bibliography
 * Caatinga parakeet


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Caatinga parakeet

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The lead of this article is very brief and to the point, with just a couple sentences detailing the name and origin of the species. It does a nice job of being concise, but it could add have some more detail to fully lead into all of the information provided later on.

Content

This article is short, and classified by Wikipedia as a stub. I think there is probably more information that can be added still, but what is there so far is very clear and concise. You could add information such as the average lifespan, population sizes, or mating patterns. You might also be able to add more detail on the information provided, elaborating on diet and the illegal selling of these birds.

Tone and Balance

The information in this article all appears neutral and unbiased. There are not any instances of trying to persuade readers towards one direction or another.

Sources and References

The source that you have added is clearly cited in the article, but I do not see the other source referenced anywhere in the article, so you might want to look through that. The links all seem to work as they should. If possible, it would be good to add in more references here to more fully capture the literature available on the topic.

Organization

The content all appears to be concise and without errors. It could be organized into more sections that break up the information, but this would also require more content to be written.