User:Kirsten.bures/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Talk:Dominance (genetics)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because I think dominance is a very aspect idea to understand when it comes to genetics. My first impression was that this article needs some improvement, especially after reading the talk page.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

I think the lead section is well written and straight to the point of what we are wanting to learn from this article. The overall content is well fitting to the topic but it is missing in-text citations to show the validity of the information. I think the tone remains neutral throughout the entirety of the article. Like stated before, there needs to be citations to give credit to the sources being used in this article. The organization and writing quality is fairly decent. I don't notice any huge issues that jump out at you. There are a few images on the page but I think there could be a few more to help understand the topic better. The captions under the images are pretty well explained. The talk page had a lot of improvements suggested and I agree that there are improvements needed. Overall, the status of this article is a C rating. It definitely has a lot of room for improvement.