User:KirstenIvins/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Daniel M. Romero

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I have never heard of Daniel Romero before so I want to learn about him.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Th lead section of this article provides a clear and concise description of who Daniel Romero is. This article highlights the points mentioned in the lead section well, primarily covering Romero's career and research which is emphasized in the lead section. The article's content is relevant to the topic. The article has an unbiased and neutral tone, simply stating the facts about Romero's education and career/research. The article is very well written, with clear and professional descriptions of Romero with information well organized into specific sections. The sources and references used in this article are up to date with the information provided in the article coming from many credible sources. This article is listed as Start-class on Wikipedia's assessment, especially as the article is listed as low importance for many other Wiki Projects. A comment made by another editor was asking when and where Daniel Romero was born. My impression of this article is that it is well and professionally written, but I agree that it does not seem to be of large importance. Additionally, this article could be expanded upon.