User:Kitterbitter160/Scientific integrity/Mrl058 Peer Review

The overall organization and information given provided is very clear and gives a sufficient amount of knowledge on the aspect of health across the nation. One of the references that I have found that could be useful is from the National Library of medicine.


 * 1) Intellectual honesty in proposing, performing, and reporting research
 * 2) Accuracy in representing contributions to research proposals and results
 * 3) Fairness in peer review
 * 4) Collegiality in scientific interactions, including communications and sharing of resources
 * 5) Transparency in conflicts of interest or potential conflicts of interest
 * 6) Protection of human subjects in the conduct of research
 * 7) Adherence to the mutual responsibilities between investigators and their research teams
 * 8) Humane care of animals in the conduct of research
 * 9) While this is related to animals it can still be applied to other areas of science

Reference:


 * 1) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK208714/#_ddd00036_

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)