User:Kitty56877/Textile recycling/Jaljoe2018 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? ( Esteebehar)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: [Https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Esteebehar/sandbox?action=edit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Esteebehar/sandbox?action=edit]

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, the introduction states that excess textile negatively affects the environment.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes, the article states what the author believes are the main reasons why textile negatively affects the environment.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No, the author took information directly from the article and put it into their own words.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The lead is very concise and states general information about why excess textile is negative and how it affects our environment.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, it stays on topic about excess textile.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes, the information is current.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No, all of the content is relevant to the topic.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? The author has the opinion that excess textile negatively affects the environment and they provides evidence and facts to back it up.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? It doesn't seem bias because it provides facts.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? The author could provide more evidence to support the claim that excess textile negatively affects the environment.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? The contents doesn't have any persuasive words but it backs up the claim that excess textile negatively affects the environment rather than positively help it.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, their source is reliable.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes, the text clearly supports the topic.
 * Are the sources current? Yes, the source was recently published.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes the source works.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? I don't notice any errors within the writing.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes it's well organized and I can clearly see what the article is going to discuss.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? No, the author needs to provide more information for the article to be completed.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? They summarized the main points of the issue.
 * How can the content added be improved? The content is broad so the author could expand the article more.