User:Kiyana929/Communication ethics/Destiny Hartanto Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kiyana929


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Kiyana929/Communication ethics
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The article does well in defining the terms and explaining it thoroughly while also giving examples of what an ethics code is. I was surprised that there wasn't anything on the code of ethics until Kiyana added her own. The subject was presented clearly, the lead was clear with its introductions, and all contents were relevant to the topic. The content is neutral and does not have any tone, it does not have grammar errors though i would change the wording ont he second sentence because it's a bit confusing. The article is also easy to read and cited well. I wouldn't think of any content that is missing except that it would be great if sections and more headers were added so that the article would look more like a Wikipedia article. Examples of sections would be "Different Versions of Ethics Codes", "History", etc. One thing that I would also suggest to improve the article is to put more sources, either 2 or 3 to complete the article. I liked how you put the importance of the topic you are presenting and the impacts at the end of your paragraphs, it's a great example that I can also put in my article. Great job Kiyana!

Best of luck for the rest of class,

~