User:Kiyana929/Communication ethics/Psun23 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kiyana929


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Kiyana929/Communication ethics


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Thanks for allowing myself a chance to critique your article! I had fun reading it. I wasn't sure if you were starting your own article, or adding on to the existing one on this topic. It seems like this is a new take on communication ethics so I am assuming it is a new article draft. To be notable, however, you will need to add an addition 2-3 reliable secondary sources.

I thought your lead was great, very concise and to the point.

I did notice a lack of sources, and believe that your article needs more supporting data. The information provided is relevant and flowed nicely, but you should try to find a source a bit more recent to back it all up. It would benefit your writing credibility to have a larger range of authors included in your article. Additionally, I think you should look into adding links to other Wikipedia articles to help give your draft more discoverability.

For the most part, I thought you did a great keeping the article neutral toned, however one area felt like it might come across as a bit bias. When you wrote, "With fake news becoming more prevalent in today's society", I felt that it might be inferring. I am on your side with that one, but could see it appearing as more bias.

You wrote a lot of great information about communication ethics, but I feel like the article would benefit greatly with a bit more organization and structure. Possibly creating subsections to make it obvious what topic in the article one is reading.

Overall, I think you did a great job and provided a lot of relevant information on the topic. I would focus on getting more sources and organizing the article to have easy to read subsections.

Pria Sundher