User:Kj3gomez/England's Brewsters c. 1400

Overview of Preindustrial Europe
The investiture conflict set the stage for the socio-political, economic, and religious influence of the late Middle Ages. The solidification of the Catholic Church led to the growth and formation of communities in Western Europe. Towns and cities became hubs of commerce and intellectualism. The formation of guilds professionalized the craft of tradesmen. The success of merchants and guilds gave power and influence on a new economic class of non-elites. Cities became trading ports for merchants. Manorial lords began shifting away from the manors and moving into cities.[1] In the fourteenth century the brewing of ale became recognized as a professionalized trade. The essential foodstuffs to the average peasant family diet are bread and ale. The safety of water consumption was deemed unreliable, therefore; alternative solution was the brewing of ale. The brewing of ale originated as women’s work in the rural countryside towns and villages and were referred to as “brewsters.” When brewing trade transitioned into the control of men, use of the term “brewsters” was phased out of the English vocabulary as women’s participation in the trade decreased.[2] Women played an integral role in the brewing industry during the late Middle Ages but were slowly phased out of the trade due to the commercialization of the economy and trade itself.

Preceding male dominance and professionalization of the industry, women played an integral role in the brewing during the late Middle Ages, but their presence eroded amidst rapid urbanization and were eventually phased out due to the commercialization of the and recognition as an official industry.

Gendered Thinking in the late Middle Ages
Throughout Western history women are often characterized as weak and dependent reflecting contemporary concepts of gender of late eighteenth and early nineteenth century historians. In the 1970s, an increase of feminist historians provided a new perspective of women and their role in society during the late Middle Ages. Historians Judith Bennet and Ruth Karras suggest the gendered thinking of this period provided women with greater flexibility and opportunities than women in of early modern Europe. The concept of gender was dominated by religious thought opposed to biological differences of men and women. Through religious and literary texts women faced a double standard of behavioral expectations; on the one hand they are celebrated for pious behavior, seen in Carolyn Bynum’s argument for “Jesus as mother.”[3] On the other hand, women were scrutinized for sexual promiscuity or enablers of sinful behavior seen in the characterization of brewsters in The Book Concerning Piers the Plowman.[4]

General Facts about brewing
The staple to the medieval peasant’s diet was ale and bread because the consumption of water was discouraged because it was unsafe to drink. Women would brew ale for their family’s consumption and sell the excess to neighbors for additional income. On the countryside most families could not sustain stock of foodstuffs because of the necessary equipment and time-consuming process of brewing and baking. Towns and villages depended on commercial brewers and bakers. The English government began regulation of foodstuffs, bread, and ale, through the Assize of Bread and Ale enforcing the measure, quality, and pricing standards sold in the market economy. Prices would be based on fluctuations of grain prices. The local authorities or manorial courts could oversee the inspection of ale and bread, as a result a licensing system emerged from frequent product inspections. Brewers faced inspections more frequently than bakers because brewing was often practiced inconsistently. Over time the standards and regulations became specify to the trade. Fines were given to brewers who sold their product illegally or failed to adhere to the guidelines of the Assize of Ale and Bread.[5]

Rural Countryside, Towns, and Villages
Brewing on the commercial level was not common in in the rural countryside and would be managed by large households. Brewing was accessible to peasants and not limited to the elite. The time-consuming process or brewing was easier for households to manage and often involved familial help. Women in the countryside did not compete with male brewers. Single women were not brewers in the rural setting because it would not be profitable for them. (20-22)

The oversight of brewing was more likely a decision related to management of labor and regional economy.Brewing was appealing to women because it overlapped with the domestic duties required in household management. Women found opportunity for additional income to their families through brewing and working as spinners or wet nurses.

The inspection and documentations of the product of brewers gives insight to women engaging in commercial brewing. Rural economies were most effective for implementation of domestic industries into the work of a family being able to cooperate and share responsibility in the work. After the plague, it may have been more beneficial for men to involve themselves in their second source of income because previously their work was more demanding. Brewing in households fluctuated over time and geographically which impacted women in commercial brewing.

The tools and skill set required for brewing could be found in the average household. The tools used were large pots, ladles, vats, and straining clothes, but domestic production was unreliable because of the time-consuming process and rapid spoiling of the ale. To counteract this problem, families would alternate between the production and purchase of ale. Families in the countryside could meet domestic needs by overlap of produce production, and still needed to purchase bread and ale. Prior to the fourteenth century commercial brewing was not lack profitability and organization to be successful in the rural setting.

Brigstock
Through the observation of Brigstock’s ale fines in the years preceding the Black death, demonstrate the role women played in commercial brewing prior to the mid fourteenth century. The contribution of women in the commercial economy in preindustrial Europe, contradict the traditional structure gender roles. The records of alewives contradict the narrative of women being defined and limited to their role as a wife and mother and the underestimation of work required in managing a household. Women who brewed varied because it was often done sporadically and sold to neighbors as an informal source of income. Commercial brewing was done by alewives, who frequently provided income to their households. Brigstock was unique because brewing was done by the wives whose husbands influenced the community on different levels. Some brewers were widows who sold ale before the death of their husbands, but eventually became inactive in the ale market. Single women were not brewers because it was not profitable and required the support of a household to make profit on the commercial level. Brigstock’s alewives were unique because they faced no competition with male brewers in contrast to woman in the rural countryside. The division of male and female brewers was not defined the organization of the industry but most likely reflected the family dynamic within the household. The dynamic also varied across time and geographic location. For example, it may have been more effective for women to oversee the brewing because Women were responsible for brewing when their husbands work was time consuming. It seems women dominating in brewing was related to men being occupied with other work. Documentation does not indicated women benefited or limited the role of commercial brewing. Women did not have the same political and economic opportunities as men during this time, but it seems possible for alewives to be perceived as more prestigious because of their interaction with the commercial market and financially contributing their families may have established a partnership within their marriage. Women in Brigstock’s influence in their community seems to be dictated by their relationship status providing different opportunities to them. Alewives had limited access to the market economy, and their worked was centered around the family rural economy. The brewing of ale did not liberate women and grant equal rights and privileges held by their husbands, but rather provided them with the opportunity to contribute to their family’s income intermittently and have a limited role in the market economy which was not previously an option.[6]

The division of male and female brewers was not defined the organization of the industry but most likely reflected the family dynamic within the household. The dynamic also varied across time and geographic location. For example, it may have been more effective for women to oversee the brewing because Women were responsible for brewing when their husbands work was time consuming. It seems women dominating in brewing was related to men being occupied with other work. Documentation does not indicated women benefited or limited the role of commercial brewing. Women did not have the same political and economic opportunities as men during this time, but it seems possible for alewives to be perceived as more prestigious because of their interaction with the commercial market and financially contributing their families may have established a partnership within their marriage. Women in Brigstock’s influence in their community seems to be dictated by their relationship status providing different opportunities to them. Alewives had limited access to the market economy, and their worked was centered around the family rural economy. The brewing of ale did not liberate women and grant equal rights and privileges held by their husbands, but rather provided them with the opportunity to contribute to their family’s income intermittently and have a limited role in the market economy which was not previously an option.[6]

Women in the late Middle Ages had a more equal partnership in the Middle Ages but at the economy industrialized women’s opportunities decline because they were not encouraged to join guilds, and unable to enter positions of power and influence. As the process of urbanization and commercialization of the trade industry became geared toward male dominance, women in the work force declined due to their inability to compete for jobs and receive fair wages. The social structure and gender roles became fixed altering the relationship of working as England becomes a modern state.[7]

Urban Brewing
When the market of ale changed the alterations to relationship and role of women in brewing in cities and the rural countryside reflect the documented trends in the late fourteenth century. As the ale market expanded in cities, the decline of women’s role in brewing were in direct relation to the expansion and increased interest of male brewers. The towns were impacted the most through the commercialization and industrialization of the urban economies. The changes of the brewing industry and trade were not necessarily exponential, but reflect social and economic context, and varied based on the geographic location. Prior to black death there was a shift of men interest in brewing as a profession. Some were able to identify themselves as professional or master brewers’ status throughout fourteenth century. Women were slowly phased out of the brewing trade and had become predominantly male by the seventeenth century.

In rural towns men and women shared the profits of brewing. The process of men dominating the brewing trade was in the transitional stages during the fourteenth century. The ale market of towns and villages were closely monitored because the urban populations were dependent on their production of ale. Accessibility and affordability of ale was crucial to urban populations. The trade was profitable despite existing on a smaller scale of operation and proximity to cities. The trade was not considered prestigious, but as it became professionalized and grew on the commercialized scale the Brewer’s Guild became more influential and independent from the city of London’s control.

Medieval historians begin to question and examine urban brewers to further understand the development a task originally belonging to rural women surfacing as a trade conducted by men in the city of London’s sector and market. The structure of gender was not inflexible as some historians have argued. Men and women adjusted their roles as they saw fit to the changes around them which occurred in London, York, and Oxford. Historians are intrigued by the dynamics in occurred London because the population was three to five times the size of towns and villages. The records from London indicate the growing differences between brewing in terms of professionalization of the industry and the contrasting role of women brewers in medieval towns and cities. In the early fifteenth century, William Polond, the clerk of the Guild of Brewers in London, took extensive notes as the clerk of the Guild of Brewers in London. Poland’s notes suggest the guild faced conflict between the mayoral authority and the guild’s brewers. The brewers raised funds to challenge the city’s oversight of the trade.

Brewers' Guild of London
The Brewer’s guild became more influential as a consolidated trade offering exclusive membership. The Brewer’s Guild was able to regulate their trade but where it was their responsibility to adhere to local authorities. If they went against the set guidelines or their practiced lack transparency the city could intervene in the affairs of the Guild.In 1438 the Guild was incorporated as part of royal grant which officially gave the brewing industry independence from the city and established them as a permanent and officially recognized trade. The Brewers’ Guild became completely dependent of the city and could supervise the retail of ale in the city and its outskirts. The relationship between the city and guild became a partnership in the regulation of the brewing industry.

Not everyone participated in guild membership, by-trade practice of brewing may have avoided membership. The by-trade could be regulated by the guild but did not have recognition or prestige associated with membership. A division between non-guild and guild members became clear. About one third of the trade participated as members of the guild. The brewing industry was built on a complex interconnected network with diverse levels of brewers.

According to Judith M. Bennett, one third of the guild membership was held by women, but is an underrepresentation, in contrast to other historians because she includes the wives of men in the Brewers’ Guild. Some coupled paid for membership together, while some women paid for their membership independent from their husband, the reason for this is unclear; the assumption made is the women’s husband practices another craft, or widowed women continue to manage their brewhouse after the passing of her husband. The perception of marriage in the brewing industry was beneficial for perception in public in comparison to single women in brewing.

The retailing aspect of the industry was commonly associated with women, who were referred to as “hucksters,” essentially sold ale door to door. Hucksters worked closely with brewers and most likely were servants of the master brewer. The hucksters were the scape goat when it came to the drunkenness of customers’, Women were often taken advantage of by the brewers cutting their profits or men confiscating their product claiming to be city authorities. It was rare for men to work as Hucksters, but in the few cases documented they replaced their wife’s position. Servants were not protected by the guild. The resale of ale inflated the prices in the cities and the outskirt which angered the city authorities. They attempted to remove them from the network of the industry, only to discover the removal of their position was harmful to the market’s supply of quality ale.

Men received far greater opportunity for advancement and mobility within the industry's network. Occupations related to the brewing trade like hostlers or innkeepers, servants who were journeymen or a chief brewer or second brewer in the manufacturing environment and were positions held by men. Servants in the trade were considered skilled and could be a stepping stone for men wanting to enter the trade. Apprenticeships were uncommon in towns and in cities prior to the sixteenth century.

London Brewer’s Guild allowed women to become members, but they did not have the same privileges as the men. Members of the guild tended to be married couples because it was more beneficial to run the operation together. It could be advantageous for husbands enroll themselves in the guild because men were more likely ascertain prestigious contracts with the crown and presented a more desirable reputation to the public based on the social context. Wives and widows often paid their own fees separately from their husbands, and it is not clear why. Women did not receive full membership because they were unable to hold office positions, or advocate for their needs within the industry. In this social context allowing women to hold office positions could potentially lead to mobilization and demanding economic and political rights

Men were free of guild, joined fraternity, and held office positions in the guild. Women did not have mobility within the trade as it continued to advance. Women did not wear livery like men, it could have been a practical choice or if they wore the livery if cold be related to their husband’s status. Wives were able to enter the fraternity and attend annual dinners. The women who entered the fraternity most likely joined with their husbands. Women were not encouraged or discouraged from actively wearing the livery. Wearing livery of the Brewer’s Guild established the prestige, professionalization, and solidarity of the industry. Women were unable to reach the status of master brewer. Few single women joined the guild because they could not afford the initiation fees or were unstable sustain their membership consistently. Judith Bennett argues women did not have in equal footing when competing with men in the trade. Although, one in every three members of the guild were women, they were limited members and provided to opportunity to advance, were unable to accredited for their success, or recognized as professionals. Unfortunately, other guild who allowed women to join most likely would have received worse treatment than the Brewers’ guild. After 1400, working women’s status declined as professionals. Women who remained in the industry had access to the lowest status and wages available in the trade. As the prestige of the brewing industry increased, the role of women in brewing ceased to exist.[8]

Conclusion
Multiple factors contributed to the decline to England’s brewsters in the late Middle Ages. The social-cultural and economic context of Western Europe indicates it became less beneficial for women to remain in the brewing trade. The inability for women to hold office positions in the guild prevented them from advocating for their needs in the trade. Widows and married women were able to remain in the trade longer than single women because their relationship status created an established perception in the commercial and market economy Brewing provided opportunity for women to earn a profitable income and enter the workforce as manufacturers or retailers of ale. As men entered the trade opportunities for advancement increased, while women’s decreased which is seen in the decline of women’s membership in the Brewer’s guild. Although women were limited by economic and political constraints of society, brewing provided to make a profitable income, participate in a professionalized trade, and attractive job opportunity alternative to sex work or spinning. The role of women in the late Middle Ages seemed to be more flexible before the industrialization of the economy in England’s modern period; resulting in women’s work becoming a professionalized trade and prestigious industry dominated by men.