User:Kjcampbell18/Zanni/Mtlevine Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * Kjcampbell18
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Zanni

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Based on the article history, it does not appear that the student edited the article, so if she did add content and update the lead, it is unclear.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * No, it describes what the article is about but does not share information from each section.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * Concise. It could maybe even include more detail.

Lead evaluation
It is clear, but it could include more info on upcoming sections.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, it describes the different features of the character well.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes, for as up-to-date as it can be.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * The "Actors" section seems out of place. It could either be removed or edited to relate more to the topic of the character.

Content evaluation
The content is through, but one section seems random.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No, since the tone is neutral and I don;t feel swayed towards a perspective as a reader.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No

Tone and balance evaluation
The article successfully conveys a neutral tone.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes, I think each major layer of the topic is described.

Organization evaluation
The clarity of each sections adds to effective organization.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media - I do not believe that she added this.


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
'''If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above. - This is not a new article.'''


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
Since it does not seem that my classmate edited this article, I am unable to judge her contribution. However, a point for future edits could be the "Actors" section to make it more relevant to the topic of the article.