User:Kjcarlson/sandbox

 Article Evaluation 
 * "Moral Injury"
 * While evaluating this article, I found the information presented to be extremely sparse. A thorough review of moral injury was not provided. The article does present as neutral, but lacks common perspectives in moral injury research, such as military/combat related moral injury. The links for the citations on the article worked. I think the article could benefit from use of more systematic reviews as sources, as the sources provided seemed very specific. The article's talk page stated that the article was labeled as "Start Class" on the WikiProject Psychology quality scale, meaning that it is "quite incomplete and may or may not cite adequate sources." The quality scale also suggests that the article needs "substantial improvement" on content and organization, which I would agree with. The organization of the topics did not paint a cohesive picture of moral injury.