User:Kjungels/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Roger Federer

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I enjoy watching and playing tennis and I know that Roger Federer is a valuable player in the sport.

Evaluate the article
- The lead an introductory section that adequately described him

- The lead has a brief description of the sections

-The lead does not include information not present in the article

- The lead is concise

- The content is relevant, up to date, and it does not deal with equity gaps. Additionally, it does not seem that there is content that does not belong.

- The tone seems neutral. The author does not try to persuade us towards liking Federer or not and does not include any controversial opinions.

- Sources are backed by secondary opinions and they are current, through, and written by diverse authors. Additionally, the links work and they are seem to be the best sources possible for this topic.

- The article is clear, concise, and easy to read. I agree with the layout of the article especially because it keeps all of the big matches together.

- The article contains well captioned images that adhere to copyright violations and are laid out in a visually appealing way.

- This article is a part of wiki projects and is rated as a good article. The comments in the talk section are about grammatical errors and not about content.

The article is overall very strong. One of its overall strengths is that it represents Rodger Federer in a non-bias way which could be difficult for his fans. The article could be improved by fixing some of the grammatical errors that are mentioned on the talk page. The article is well-developed because not only does it give a good background of Roger Federer, but it also described in detail his tennis experience.