User:Kjwonglam/Hunger in the United States/Kjwonglam Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * Michelleho1100
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Michelleho1100/Hunger in the United States

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Yes
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * Yes

Content evaluation
Solid content that adds details to the many statistics already present in the article. Very tangible evidence. I know your other article is on SNAP, but the section here on SNAP could end on a brief, current summary of SNAP and college students.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No

Tone and balance evaluation
Good neutral point of view.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes, within the last 10 years
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes

Sources and references evaluation
They are solid.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Just a small thing, but the citations go after the period :) Also add another paragraph space before your paragraph on food pantries.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes

Organization evaluation
It is well organized.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Yes, good elaborations on why students may be food insecure and why food pantries are a first-step resource for students.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * Added content contributes more about the personal experience of college students beyond statistics, ie some of the social/societal factors.
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * See comments about SNAP.

Overall evaluation
Good details! I especially appreciate the information about food pantries pertaining to college students, nice mix of Caplan and El Zein et al.