User:Kjwonglam/Hunger in the United States/Seanapplegate Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Kjwonglam
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Michelleho1100/Hunger in the United States

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Most definitely.

Content evaluation
The content added reveals new, useful information regarding the sub-topic. It adds to the relevant history.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Tone and balance evaluation
The added content conveys a neutral tone, without attempting to persuade.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Yes, and yes.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Sources and references evaluation
The sources incorporate a wide range of perspectives, with sources relevant to the course information.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, added content is appropriate for each sub-category.

Organization evaluation
You may benefit from adding the last typed section to the existing section about SNAP.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The content added incorporates relevant source information to create a greater contextualization of the sub-topic.
 * How can the content added be improved? Potentially, speak more about what long-term solutions may be for college students.

Overall evaluation
The added content is useful to convey a perspective on the structural forces effecting hunger for U.S. college students. I would like to also see more added to the last section of the existing article.