User:Kkeenan3/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link) Forest Management., Forest management
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. This is a topic that interest me and am wanting to learn more about everyone else's view on forest management.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Kinda, Could use some clarity.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? yes
 * Is the content up-to-date? yes Last updated 25 minutes prior to me opening the page.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Yes
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Yes has a section about public awareness. Does not talk about the history of the topic.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No seems very balanced
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? Yes include sources from 2020
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Yes, does not include historically marginalized individuals.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes but could add more subjects about the topic.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Kinda definitely could be more clear about the topic and not just a random picture of the forest.
 * Are images well-captioned? Yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? There needs to be an image at the top of the page cause there is a lot of unfilled areas.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? A litle bit of talk about the concept of forest land property and ownership.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? rated well not part of the Wikiprojects.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? Not as detailed, I feel there is missing material.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? good
 * What are the article's strengths? Public input and awareness, Definitions
 * How can the article be improved? more material
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? It  could definitely use some more work to fill in the gaps of missing material.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: