User:Klikata/Lake 223/Hez28 Peer Review


 * Your article is well structured, and the segmentation makes the article clear and easy to understand. I really like the subheadings you added to the article. These subheadings help people read it easily.
 * Since this is an experimental lake, your content will be very clear about what you play. I think this is very good.
 * Since Lake 233 is an experimental lake, it is difficult to write more information. Your draft is currently about 700 words. In order to add more information, I think you might be able to write something about why the researcher chose the experimental lake located in northwestern Ontario, Canada to do the experiment.
 * I think your References section looks a little messy, so you can reorganize these links.

Overall, I think you wrote very well. I think you provide a good background and the content is neutral. Your description of the study on lake acidification of Lake 233 is very clear. Does this lake have any other studies or information, such as Euphotic zone information?