User:Klikata/Lake 223/Katiebusch7 Peer Review

Hi Ty...Tye?...not sure how you prefer spelling,

Below are my comments on your first draft. Your current word count is 658 and you have 7 refs (5 scientific articles).

For your intro paragraph this is a good start. One of my biggest comments is making sure you start to add in links to other wikipages to help the reader better understand uncommon words. Also there is a very large and well developed wiki page already on the experimental lakes area which you could easily just link in your intro rather than spending a paragraph talking about it. Experimental Lakes Area. I'd strengthen your intro section with some more specific content on your lake like size, max depth, seasonality?, common found organisms, etc.

You have a good start to you research section. I would break up the studies by subsection to make it easier for the reader not confuse the two experiments.

Besides some few grammatical errors this is a great start and I'm happy to see someone go over 600 on their first draft.

-Katie

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)