User:Kllamanzares/Comstock Saloon/Rosaamoore Peer Review

General info
Kllamanzares
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Kllamanzares/Comstock Saloon:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists) Comstock Saloon

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes, the information provides information about current ownership.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Comstock salon and it's history
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Doesn't include anything about the interior of the saloon
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Doesn't include anything about the interior of the saloon
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Concise. Straight to the point and not too much information.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? There wasn't a page for this saloon prior, so this is good start.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Has history over the year, but minor information about the present
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? More present information. Covid? What about now? https://www.sfgate.com/food/article/comstock-saloon-sf-reservations-18436323.php
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Yes, this article is almost like new page and provides new information to the Wiki network.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Very matter of fact
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, author lays on history in order, doesn't provide any persuasion to the reader to favor one side.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Reviewed sources, sources are mainly newspaper articles.
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Sources are of a good quality.
 * Are the sources current? Current within the last ten years.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Since this is a bar, it's harder to find sources other than a newspaper, magazine or event TV show or special.
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.) Included this website above, I was reading the SF Gate and came across this article. I remembered he had this topic. https://www.sfgate.com/food/article/comstock-saloon-sf-reservations-18436323.php
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, links work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? This article is very easy to read - I like the layout and the tone of the article. Very neutral.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Read it a couple of times, didn't see any errors. not 100% sure on the citing, but looks pretty complete.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? History of saloon and the interior.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? I don't seen any images yet, but I see the coordinates to the saloon.
 * Are images well-captioned? No images - find images that are represent the time periods or one that is current of the saloon. Interior of the saloon that makes it unique.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? No images yet
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? No images yet

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes, this article prior had very little information and could use more history of saloon.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? Paints a clear picture of the history
 * How can the content added be improved? Current information - how did it the business survive during covid-19, what is the business like today?

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)