User:Klm01011/Thiomargarita namibiensis/Anikait Chand Peer Review

General info
Klm01011/Thiomargarita namibiensis/
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User talk:Klm01011/Thiomargarita namibiensis - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Thiomargarita namibiensis - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall, this is a really good draft! Many of the sections contained a lot of good information that was not too complicated to understand. So firstly the introduction section: Overall it is pretty good. You have added more simple and necessary information to describe your bacterium. I am assuming this paragraph will be added to the already large section they have in the already published article. The only few issues I found were grammatical. I think there were some sentences that could flow better. The next section (discovery): I would say this is your best section! Obviously you will need to fix the citations at the end of each paragraph, but overall this was a very good section which will enhance this section in the existing article. The metabolism section already seems to have a lot of information in the existing article, so I know it will be hard to find more information. I think the paragraph that you guys have written is good, but I am not sure where it fits into the metabolism section specifically. Like looking at the published article I am not sure where you could fit this paragraph in, so be mindful about how you can make it flow. The structure section is really really good. There is not much information you can add, but one thing I noticed was the lack of citations in this section. I know Wikipedia a picky about citations so make sure you have enough citations. The significance section is well written. I think that maybe if you guys could find more things it could be useful for. Maybe look up using the words "industrial use" which is what I did for my bacterium which helped find why it is so useful. This would also enable you to add some more images. I think any article is better with more images, so if you able to find any that relate to its significance/industrial use then that will be helpful. A few minor things to fix, in the heading of each section, capitalize the first letter. Citations are definitely lacking so make sure you have them saved somewhere and add them in before you publish. And lastly, i noticed the published article does not have much information for the genome section, so if you can find more information to add to that section that will complete the section.