User:Klm757/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hey_Reb!

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I grew up in Las Vegas and attended many if the UNLV sporting events, specifically the basketball games and enjoyed seeing the UNLV mascot (Hey Reb!). My preliminary impression was that the article is well-written in a neutral tone.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The Lead section is clear and concise, and provides the article’s main sections.

The Content was relevant and up-to-date. It did not clearly cover the “Criticism” section. The section did not clearly cover the equity gap.

The Tone and Balance of the article is written form a neutral point of view, but all viewpoints were not clearly described.

The Sources and References were covered for the article. Found at least one source that was not accurate and

Following links from the article were broken:


 * "Hey Reb!"
 * "After Six Years, Jon "Jersey" Goldman Takes Off the Hey Reb! Suit"
 * "Mascot/Spirit Mark".
 * ""Hey Reb" Stars in Mascot TV Series"

The Organization and Writing quality of the article was organized with clear sections defined and well-written.

The Images and Media in the article covers previous mascots but did not reflect any images or links to images of the previous mascots, which would have been helpful to visualize the issue behind the UNLV mascots.

The Talk Page Discussion on the article is rated as a C-class project. There was no discussion for improving the Hey Reb! Page. The article is part of the following WikiProjects:


 * WikiProject College Football
 * WikiProject College Basketball
 * WikiProject Nevada/Las Vegas
 * WikiProject Public Art
 * WikiProject Sculpture
 * WikiProject Visual Arts

The Overall Impression of the article is fair. The article’s strengths are it is a well-organized and written well in a neutral tone. The article can be improved by providing the equity gap, images of past mascots and ensuring all links are working to the references.