User:Klolio41/Evaluate an Article


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Everything in the article is relevant to the topic. Nothing is distracting me.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * No, everything is there that needs to be.
 * Can you identify any notable equity gaps? Does the article underrepresent or misrepresent historically marginalized populations?
 * No.
 * What else could be improved?
 * Nothing nice work person.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * It is neutral.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No.


 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * Everything works.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * I think they are appropriate and reliable reference.
 * Do the sources come from a diverse array of authors and publications?
 * yes.


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * I'm not sure.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * It is related to what I am looking for and no.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * It only talked about one kind while we saw a few different kinds.

(English Gothic stained glass windows - Wikipedia)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chosen this article to evaluate to help guide me for my page even. It is something I found interesting as well.