User:Klrgmclass/Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders/Rmya1515 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
I think it's generally good. I think your work was really good, detailed and informative. I really couldn't think of much to say because I think you guys ddi really good, but if I would have any comments, I think it is a little biased at times only because there will be a claim like The development of diagnoses for the DSM has been connected to capitalism. Which isn't sourced so it seems more like an opinion. Very concise and to the point, at times I feel like over-explaining is an issue for items that are hyperlinked (to another wiki page) and this was throughout so stay mindful and vigilant that we aren't reinterpreting the definitions at times. There are no pictures, but I don't think that a photo in incredibly relevant. I feel like this work added to the article in ways that are seamless. I don't notice that this wasn't in the article already which is a very good thing.