User:Km79358n/Cyrus Kabiru/Gabbypace Peer Review

General info
Km79358n
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Cyrus Kabiru
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The article is very well written, all the links work and gives me a bit of insight into Kabiru’s mind. Viewing this as an artist it also gives me a sense of self. Reading it gives me comfort in my own art as Kabiru made art based off the way he felt was fit. I would like to see more details and maybe a few pictures of his art and maybe a little bit more insight into Kabiru’s mind when it comes down to his craft. Overall, the article is neutral and only describes what is seen rather than what the editor feels. There is a missing lead in the main article, but I am sure that can be an easy add. I think another thing that could be added, is more detail about some of his specific works to give the reader an idea of the types of art Kabiru creates. These things make the article strong, and should keep the story going as it is very intriguing.