User:Kmani111/New York-style pizza/CaitlinSchmill Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kmani111


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Creating User:Kmani111/New York-style pizza/CaitlinSchmill Peer Review - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * New York-style pizza - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
There is no information within the sandbox, so I will be peer reviewing the article itself.

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * The Lead is currently up to date.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * yes, the lead does include an introductory sentence that is concise with the article's topic
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No, it includes all pertinent information.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * Concise
 * Concise

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * All content is relevant to the topic
 * Is the content added up to date?
 * All content is up to date
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * No, everything is exactly how ot should be
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * No, it does not

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * All content is neutral
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No information in the article is biased
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No there are not
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No, it is clearly all about New York style pizza. ￼

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * all sources are reliable
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)
 * Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work?\
 * Yes, they work

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * All content is clear and concise and easy to read.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No spelling errors that I noticed
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes, all sections are broken down and reflect the major points of the topic

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Yes, there are plenty of images
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Yes, each picture is captioned
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * Yes

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Yes the article is complete
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * The history and the many images displaying New York style Pizza
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * I feel like the article is perfect in depicted the New York Style Pizza