User:Kmastrianni/Abortion-rights movements/Atufail Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kmastrianni


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Abortion-rights movements - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead looks good and concise. The only thing that might be considered is where it says, " ...also referred to as pro-choice..." in the first sentence, there can be a note saying that these terms are now considered loaded and those in the movement opt for more neutral alternatives for both the terms "pro-choice" and "pro-life". But then again it is also addressed later under the Terminology section.

The first image in the article is of Abortion-rights activists in Brazil, yet there is no discussion of the movement in Brazil. Maybe a section addressing the movement in Brazil could be inserted under the South America section or an image from a country discussed in the article?

In the Early History section, could the "it" be removed in the sentence, " which Mohr argues it arose due to competition" and could "well-off people had abortions and paid well." be changed to "... and paid well for the procedure."?

In the United States section, could there be a reference to this summer's Supreme Court Mississippi v Dobbs ruling and its effects on the abortion-rights movement?

In the Russia section, was the word "up" supposed to be "upon" in this sentence, "During Romanov's reign, abortion was illegal, frowned up,"? Also was "inn" misspelled in the sentence, " After the Soviet period ended inn the Russian union,"?

Could the two United Kingdom section under the Early History section be combined with the United Kingdom section under Europe? It similarly happens with the United States sections being separated as well.

Overall, the article looks good. All the links and citations work. To me the article appears neutral with no apparent bias. And other than what might be a spelling error or two, it's a complete and informative article along with being a relevant topic. Especially with recent events and the environment here in the United States.