User:Kmorris2019/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Stem-cell therapy - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article to evaluate because I was very interested in the topic and I wanted to learn more about stem cell therapy. Stem cell therapy matters because it can treat or prevent many different diseases and conditions. Before reading the article, I scrolled through it and was very impressed with the variety of information, along with how beneficial it all was in regards to stem cell therapy. After reading the article, I had a lot more knowledge than before.

Evaluate the article
After reading through the entirety of the article, I identified a good lead section that precisely and effectively introduced the topic, along with a concise introduction. In the introductory paragraph however, there was not a description about what the rest of the article was going to cover and talk about. The article's content is up-to-date and contains information that is relevant to the topic. There is enough information to understand the topic, know exactly what it is, and provides categories of information such as research, medical uses, treatment models, drug discovery, and so much more. Throughout the article, there is no bias present that the writer tries to persuade readers with. The information is neutral, and the viewpoints are accurately described. Within the article, there are a variety of references that are current, diverse, and reflect the article's topic. The overall writing of the article is professional and very well-written. There are not any grammatical errors that I could see and the structure of the article flows well. Unfortunately, the article does not provide any images related to the topic. However, this is not necessarily necessary because the information provided for each section of the article is clear and easy to understand. The main part of the talk page discussion is a bit negative regarding the article but the talk page has not been talked on recently. A lot of the comments are from ten or more years ago and since then, the article has been improved and edited. Overall, my overall impression of the article is positive. There's a variety of different information provided such as the different sections within the article and I feel more educated on the topic. In order to improve the article, images could be added to better explain the process of stem cell therapy within patients. This could provide readers with a better understanding of how the treatment works as well.