User:Knikritin/Tolaasin/IsaqueBrandao Peer Review

General info
Knikritin
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Tolaasin

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: The lead was not edited by the student but it provides a well written and objective introduction to the subject, accurately reflecting the subject of the article.

Content: The content added is relevant and up-to-date. It enhances the article by providing additional information on how Tolaasin works.

Tone and Balance: Yes, the added content is neutral and does not attempt to persuade the reader.

Sources and References: Content is accurately cited with relevant and trust-worthy sources of information with working links. There is one reused citation. Specifically [1] that does not have a link. I am not sure if that is a Wikipedia feature for reused citations or an error.

Organization: The article is still on developmental stage so it does not have a defined structure yet. But the introductory portion is well organized, starting as broad statements to more specific ones. As expected of an introduction.

Images and Media: No, there is no image to support the content. It would be ideal to have a diagram of the molecular structure or a picture of the mechanism.